The Irrefutable Disproof
Then what is the point of our belief in the law of the jungle? The answer: None at all. In reality, it is absolutely pointless to use animals as proof that the darkest sides of human civilization are "natural". Animals have not yet killed defenseless civilians during their wars. Animals do not invent weapons of mass destruction. Animals do not threaten the climate. Animals do not prove scientifically that unemployment and wars are necessary for economy. Animals do not enact laws that protect property and status instead of existential rights. The ones who follow the law of the jungle more than any other animal are human beings. The only reason we argue this way is that we need justification—because deep down, we know we are exploiting the powerless, and we feel it is wrong. There is another fact we have to take into account before vi är färdiga med diskussionen om djungelns lag. Bevisen för naturens våldsamhet håller inte och det vet de flesta seriösa forskare: —Lorenz' a...